Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] f2fs: don't allow unaligned truncation to smaller/equal size on pinned file

[Jaegeuk Kim]

I think we can clean up more like this?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20250630160839.1142073-1-jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

On 06/30, wangzijie wrote:
> To prevent scattered pin block generation, don't allow non-section aligned truncation
> to smaller or equal size on pinned file. But for truncation to larger size, after
> commit 3fdd89b452c2("f2fs: prevent writing without fallocate() for pinned files"),
> we only support overwrite IO to pinned file, so we don't need to consider
> attr->ia_size > i_size case.
> In addition, xfstests #494 assumes truncation on active swapfile(pinned) will return
> ETXTBSY by setattr_prepare() -> inode_newsize_ok(), so we relocate this check after
> setattr_prepare().
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v5:
> - fix xfstests #494 fail
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 78368b793..d4feea44b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,23 @@ int f2fs_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * To prevent scattered pin block generation, we don't allow
> +	 * smaller/equal size unaligned truncation for pinned file.
> +	 * We only support overwrite IO to pinned file, so don't
> +	 * care about larger size truncation.
> +	 * We need to check this after setattr_prepare() because xfstests
> +	 * #494 assumes truncation on active swapfile(pinned) will
> +	 * return ETXTBSY by setattr_prepare() -> inode_newsize_ok().
> +	 */
> +	if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
> +		if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode) &&
> +			attr->ia_size <= i_size_read(inode) &&
> +			!IS_ALIGNED(attr->ia_size,
> +			F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi))))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	err = fscrypt_prepare_setattr(dentry, attr);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> -- 
> 2.25.1