Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure

[Florian Weimer]

* Steven Rostedt:

> SFrames is now supported in gcc binutils and soon will also be supported
> by LLVM.

Is the LLVM support discussed here?

  [RFC] Adding SFrame support to llvm
  <https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-adding-sframe-support-to-llvm/86900>

Or is there a secone effort?

> I have more patches on top of this series that add perf support, ftrace
> support, sframe support and the x86 fix ups (for VDSO). But each of those
> patch series can be worked on independently, but they all depend on this
> series (although the x86 specific patches at the end isn't necessarily
> needed, at least for other architectures).

Related to perf support: I'm writing up the SFrame change proposal for
Fedora, and I want to include testing instructions.  Any idea yet what a
typical “perf top” or “perf report” command line would look like?

Thanks,
Florian