Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm2290: Add venus video node
From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Fri Jun 27 2025 - 11:21:06 EST
On 6/27/25 5:12 PM, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>
> On 6/27/2025 8:38 PM, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
>> On 27/06/25 20:28:29, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/27/2025 6:03 PM, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
>>>> On 27/06/25 17:40:19, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/26/2025 7:29 PM, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>>>>>> Add DT entries for the qcm2290 venus encoder/decoder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
>>>>>> index f49ac1c1f8a3..5326c91a0ff0 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -1628,6 +1628,63 @@ adreno_smmu: iommu@59a0000 {
>>>>>> #iommu-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + venus: video-codec@5a00000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-venus";
>>>>>> + reg = <0 0x5a00000 0 0xf0000>;
>>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 225 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + power-domains = <&gcc GCC_VENUS_GDSC>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VCODEC0_GDSC>,
>>>>>> + <&rpmpd QCM2290_VDDCX>;
>>>>>> + power-domain-names = "venus",
>>>>>> + "vcodec0",
>>>>>> + "cx";
>>>>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&venus_opp_table>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_VENUS_CTL_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VENUS_CTL_AXI_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_THROTTLE_CORE_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_VCODEC0_SYS_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_VCODEC0_AXI_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "core",
>>>>>> + "iface",
>>>>>> + "bus",
>>>>>> + "throttle",
>>>>>> + "vcodec0_core",
>>>>>> + "vcodec0_bus";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + memory-region = <&pil_video_mem>;
>>>>>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x860 0x0>,
>>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x880 0x0>,
>>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x861 0x04>,
>>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x863 0x0>,
>>>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x804 0xe0>;
>>>>> keep only the non secure ones.
>>>>
>>>> ok
>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + interconnects = <&mmnrt_virt MASTER_VIDEO_P0 RPM_ALWAYS_TAG
>>>>>> + &bimc SLAVE_EBI1 RPM_ALWAYS_TAG>,
>>>>>> + <&bimc MASTER_APPSS_PROC RPM_ACTIVE_TAG
>>>>>> + &config_noc SLAVE_VENUS_CFG RPM_ACTIVE_TAG>;
>>>>>> + interconnect-names = "video-mem",
>>>>>> + "cpu-cfg";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + venus_opp_table: opp-table {
>>>>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + opp-133000000 {
>>>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <133000000>;
>>>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>> Fix the corner freq value
>>>>
>>>> can you add some reference please?
>>>>
>>>> I took this data from an internal document - not sure why the downstream
>>>> driver supports different values or where those were taken from (AFAIK
>>>> they are not supported)
>>> Most likely you have referred incorrect downstream file. Refer scuba-vidc.dtsi.
>>
>> I took them from actual documents (which might or might not be obsolete,
>> hard to say but they were the latest version and as such, they
>> contradict the downstream dtsi).
>>
>> So I'd rather not use downstream - could you point me to the reference
>> you used please - I wonder if the fix is required downstream instead of here?
>
> You can look for this file gcc-scuba.c and refer gcc_video_venus_clk_src which
> is the src for different venus clocks.
This is not a good source in general, GCC often has more rates defined
than the consumer is supposed to finally run at (because they were deemed
power-inefficient or similar, you can pretty much set any rate you want
on the clocks fwiw)
Konrad