Re: [PATCH 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Jun 25 2025 - 08:05:55 EST

Next message: Ryan Chung: "[PATCH] dfl-fme-main.c: Replace scnprintf() with sysfs_emit()"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce simple hazard pointers for lockdep"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "[PATCH 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:13:56AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Because SRCU-lite is being replaced by SRCU-fast, this commit removes
> support for SRCU-lite from refscale.c.

Please explain how they different and why one is a good enough (or
even better?) replacement for the other.

Next message: Ryan Chung: "[PATCH] dfl-fme-main.c: Replace scnprintf() with sysfs_emit()"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce simple hazard pointers for lockdep"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "[PATCH 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH 1/5] torture: Remove support for SRCU-lite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]