Re: [PATCH] can: ucan: Use usb_endpoint_type() rather than duplicating its implementation
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Wed Jun 25 2025 - 01:48:24 EST
>>> it seems that Coccinelle missed many simplifications.
>> Would such software transformations become better supported anyhow?
> Maybe?
>
> I am not involved in the development of Coccinelle and thus, I don't have an answer.
This can be fine (in principle).
> Nor do I have the time to read and understand the Coccinelle source code
> to which you pointed me to.
I hope that more users can become interested in presented information.
I would appreciate if knowledge representations can be improved also for
better automatic data processing and corresponding transformations.
> My stance is that such static analyzers should never be trusted 100%.
This is generally fine.
> The output is more an indicator.
This is usual.
> And in this present case, a quick review made it very
> clear that Coccinelle saw one simplification but missed two other ones.
Would you find another source code adjustment (like the following) more appropriate?
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
index 07406daf7c88..6c6cee3895c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
@@ -1352,17 +1352,12 @@ static int ucan_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
for (i = 0; i < iface_desc->desc.bNumEndpoints; i++) {
ep = &iface_desc->endpoint[i].desc;
- if (((ep->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) != 0) &&
- ((ep->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFERTYPE_MASK) ==
- USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK)) {
+ if (usb_endpoint_dir_in(ep) && usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(ep)) {
/* In Endpoint */
in_ep_addr = ep->bEndpointAddress;
in_ep_addr &= USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK;
in_ep_size = le16_to_cpu(ep->wMaxPacketSize);
- } else if (((ep->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) ==
- 0) &&
- ((ep->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFERTYPE_MASK) ==
- USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK)) {
+ } else if (usb_endpoint_dir_out(ep) && usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(ep)) {
/* Out Endpoint */
out_ep_addr = ep->bEndpointAddress;
out_ep_addr &= USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK;
Can the functions “usb_endpoint_is_bulk_in” and “usb_endpoint_is_bulk_out”
be applied here?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc3/source/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h#L572-L595
Regards,
Markus