Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Fix property name in comment

[Dhruva Gole]

On Jun 23, 2025 at 21:24:28 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> ti,always-on property doesn't exist. ti,timer-alwon is meant here. Fix
> this minor bug in the comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
> index 985a6d08512b42f499b3e243eb69cc9674bc8e53..fb0a3cc23b5a35e2906a253d36ccef2baccca50a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static bool __init dmtimer_is_preferred(struct device_node *np)
>   * Some omap3 boards with unreliable oscillator must not use the counter_32k
>   * or dmtimer1 with 32 KiHz source. Additionally, the boards with unreliable
>   * oscillator should really set counter_32k as disabled, and delete dmtimer1
> - * ti,always-on property, but let's not count on it. For these quirky cases,
> + * ti,timer-alwon property, but let's not count on it. For these quirky cases,

Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated