Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] locking/rwsem: clear reader-owner on unlock to reduce false positives
From: Google
Date: Mon Jun 23 2025 - 20:26:36 EST
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 12:19:25 +0800
Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> When CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER is enabled, a stale owner pointer in a
> reader-owned rwsem can lead to false positives in blocker tracking.
>
> To mitigate this, let’s try to clear the owner field on unlock, as a NULL
> owner is better than a stale one for diagnostics.
Can we merge this to [PATCH 1/3]? It seems that you removed #ifdef and
remove it. This means in anyway we need the feature enabled by DEBUG_RWSEMS.
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 6cb29442d4fc..a310eb9896de 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -205,14 +205,12 @@ bool is_rwsem_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> return false;
> return rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_READER_OWNED);
> }
> -#endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
> /*
> - * With CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS configured, it will make sure that if there
> - * is a task pointer in owner of a reader-owned rwsem, it will be the
> - * real owner or one of the real owners. The only exception is when the
> - * unlock is done by up_read_non_owner().
> + * With CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS or CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER configured,
> + * it will make sure that the owner field of a reader-owned rwsem either
> + * points to a real reader-owner(s) or gets cleared. The only exception is
> + * when the unlock is done by up_read_non_owner().
> */
> static inline void rwsem_clear_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> --
> 2.49.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>