Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf test workload noploop: Name the noploop process

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 08:12:47AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:36 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm afraid it'd introduce a build failure on musl.  Please see

> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250611092542.F4ooE2FL@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

> > I think <sys/prctl.h> would be enough.
 
> we could do that but in the glibc man page it says:
> https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/prctl.2.html
> ```
> #include <linux/prctl.h>  /* Definition of PR_* constants */
> #include <sys/prctl.h>
> ```

> It'd be nice to think musl was slowly getting fixed. I notice we're

Sebastian reported on the musl libc, its maintainer replied:

https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2025/06/12/11

- ARnaldo