Re: [PATCH net v3] ethernet: ionic: Fix DMA mapping tests

From: Brett Creeley
Date: Mon Jun 23 2025 - 11:45:08 EST




On 6/20/2025 3:51 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.


On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 03:28:06PM -0700, Brett Creeley wrote:


On 6/19/2025 2:45 AM, Thomas Fourier wrote:
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.


Change error values of `ionic_tx_map_single()` and `ionic_tx_map_frag()`
from 0 to `DMA_MAPPING_ERROR` to prevent collision with 0 as a valid
address.

This also fixes the use of `dma_mapping_error()` to test against 0 in
`ionic_xdp_post_frame()`

Fixes: 0f3154e6bcb3 ("ionic: Add Tx and Rx handling")

I'm not sure the Fixes commit above should be in the list. Functionally it's
correct, except there being multiple calls to dma_mapping_error() on the
same dma_addr.

Other than the minor nit above the commit looks good. Thanks again for
fixing this.

Reviewed-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@xxxxxxx>

Hi Brett and Thomas,

Maybe I misunderstand things, if so I apologise.

If this patch fixes a bug - e.g. the may observe a system crash -
then it should be targeted at net and have a Fixes tag. Where the
Fixes tag generally cites the first commit in which the user may
experience the bug.

If, on the other hand, this does not fix a bug then the patch
should be targeted at net-next and should not have a Fixes tag.

In that case, commits may be cited using following form in
the commit message (before the Signed-off-by and other tags).
And, unlike tags, it may be line wrapped.

commit 0f3154e6bcb3 ("ionic: Add Tx and Rx handling")

E.g.: This was introduce by commit 0f3154e6bcb3 ("ionic: Add Tx and Rx
handling").

I hope this helps. If not, sorry for the noise.

Simon,

I suspect you are right and this probably shouldn't be categorized as a bug fix since the change only addresses a corner case that would happen if the DMA mapping API(s) return 0 as a valid adddress, which wouldn't cause a crash with/without this patch.

Thanks for the feedback.

Brett


...