Re: [PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Mon Jun 23 2025 - 11:15:41 EST

Next message: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf test workload noploop: Name the noploop process"
Previous message: Kamil Horák - 2N: "[PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: phy: bcm54811: Fix the PHY initialization"
In reply to: Su Hui: "[PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code"
Next in thread: Dave Martin: "Re: [PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This seems fine to me, but I don't think anyone is eager to start
reviewing hundreds of guard() conversions unless they're in new code
or part of a bug fix.

regards,
dan carpenter

Next message: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf test workload noploop: Name the noploop process"
Previous message: Kamil Horák - 2N: "[PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: phy: bcm54811: Fix the PHY initialization"
In reply to: Su Hui: "[PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code"
Next in thread: Dave Martin: "Re: [PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]