Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: Enable Nested Virt selftests

[Marc Zyngier]

On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:31:32 +0100,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 6/19/2025 5:15 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>   >
> >>> Also, running EL2 is the least of our worries, because that's pretty
> >>> easy to deal with. It is running at EL1/0 when EL2 is present that is
> >>> interesting, and I see no coverage on that front.
> >> 
> >> Sorry, I did not get this comment fully.
> >> When we run selftest on Host with -g option, the guest code will run in vEL2 as L1.
> >> This is implemented as per comment in V1.
> >> 
> >> When we run same selftest from L1 shell, then guest_code will be running in EL0/1 like running from L0.
> > 
> > What good does this bring us if we need to boot a full guest OS to run
> > tests? What we need is synthetic tests that implement the whole stack:
> > 
> > - L1 guest hypervisor
> > - L2 guest hypervisor
> > - L2 guest
> > - L3 guest hypervisor
> > - L3 guest
> > - [...]
> 
> IIUC, selftest leverages host OS support and uses various IOCTLs to
> support the guest_code run. Are you saying to implement all this
> again (without OS help) in guest_code to run it as hypervisor and
> launch guest_code2 as NestedVM?.

The whole point of having small selftests is to run something that is
simpler several orders of magnitude simpler than the full blown
OS/hypervisor. So indeed, I'm asking for selftests that build chains
of guests up to some level and verify that the nesting, as described
in the architecture, works correctly.

> It seems to be complicated, doesn't it?

Yes, it is complicated. What did you expect?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.