Re: [PATCH 05/13] dt-bindings: perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM dt-bindings
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Jun 23 2025 - 05:50:47 EST
On 23/06/2025 11:27, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
> DDRPERFM is the DDR Performance Monitor embedded in STM32MPU SoC.
> It allows to monitor DDR events that come from the DDR Controller
> such as read or write events.
>
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/perf/st,stm32-ddr-pmu.yaml | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/st,stm32-ddr-pmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/st,stm32-ddr-pmu.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..35d34782865b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/st,stm32-ddr-pmu.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/perf/st,stm32-ddr-pmu.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +title: STMicroelectronics STM32 DDR Performance Monitor (DDRPERFM)
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32mp131-ddr-pmu
> + - st,stm32mp151-ddr-pmu
These are compatible, aren't they?
> + - st,stm32mp251-ddr-pmu
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + description: Reference clock for the DDR Performance Monitor
Drop description, obvious.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + resets:
> + description: Reset control for the DDR Performance Monitor
Drop description, obvious.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + access-controllers:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + st,dram-type:
> + description: |
> + This property is used to specify the type of DRAM memory connected to the
> + associated memory controller. It is required for the DDR Performance Monitor
> + to correctly interpret the performance data.
> + 0 = LPDDR4,
> + 1 = LPDDR3,
> + 2 = DDR4,
> + 3 = DDR3
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
No, use standard JEDEC memory bindings (memory controllers) if you need
to describe the memory, otherwise you duplicate that binding and
duplicate the memory information.
> + enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32mp131-ddr-pmu
> + - st,stm32mp151-ddr-pmu
> + then:
> + required:
> + - clocks
> + - resets
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: st,stm32mp251-ddr-pmu
> + then:
> + required:
> + - access-controllers
> + - st,dram-type
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
Best regards,
Krzysztof