On Mon, Jun 23, 2025, at 05:19, Jijie Shao wrote:
The conversion to seq_file looks good to me, this does address theon 2025/6/12 23:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote:*Hi Jakub, Arnd We have changed the impleament as your suggestion. Would
you please help check it ? If it's OK, we will rewrite the rest parts of
our debugfs code. Thanks! *
stack usage problems I was observing.
Thanks for cleaning this up!
- sprintf(result[j++], "%u", index);I'm not sure I understand the format string changes here, I did
- sprintf(result[j++], "%u", readl_relaxed(ring->tqp->io_base +
- HNS3_RING_TX_RING_BD_NUM_REG));
+ seq_printf(s, "%-4u%6s", index, " ");
+ seq_printf(s, "%-5u%3s",
+ readl_relaxed(base + HNS3_RING_TX_RING_BD_NUM_REG), " ");
not think they were necessary.
Are you doing this to keep the output the same as before, or are
you reformatting the contents for readability?
+static int hns3_dbg_common_init_t1(struct hnae3_handle *handle, u32This will work fine as well, but I think you can do slightly better
cmd)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &handle->pdev->dev;
+ struct dentry *entry_dir;
+ read_func func = NULL;
+
+ switch (hns3_dbg_cmd[cmd].cmd) {
+ case HNAE3_DBG_CMD_TX_QUEUE_INFO:
+ func = hns3_dbg_tx_queue_info;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ entry_dir = hns3_dbg_dentry[hns3_dbg_cmd[cmd].dentry].dentry;
+ debugfs_create_devm_seqfile(dev, hns3_dbg_cmd[cmd].name, entry_dir,
+ func);
+
+ return 0;
by having your own file_operations with a read function based
on single_open() and your current hns3_dbg_read_cmd().
I don't think you gain anything from using debugfs_create_devm_seqfile()
since you use debugfs_remove_recursive() for cleaning it up anyway.
Arnd