Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] media: dt-bindings: nxp,imx8-jpeg: Add compatible strings for IMX95 JPEG

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/06/2025 17:06, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 juin 2025 à 07:54 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 19/06/2025 19:16, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 19 juin 2025 à 12:27 +0800, Shawn Guo a écrit :
>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:22:04PM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mercredi 21 mai 2025 à 13:34 -0400, Frank Li a écrit :
>>>>>> Add compatible strings "nxp,imx95-jpgdec" and "nxp,imx95-jpgenc", which
>>>>>> are backward compatible with "nxp,imx8qxp-jpgdec" and
>>>>>> "nxp,imx8qxp-jpegenc". i.MX95 just need one power domain which combine
>>>>>> wrap and all slots together. Reduce minItems of power-domains to 1 for
>>>>>> i.MX95 and keep the same restriction for others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Krzysztof, will you take this one once the DTS part is ready ?
>>>>
>>>> dt-bindings is the prerequisite of DTS.  DTS patch looks good to me
>>>> and I'm waiting for dt-bindings part to be applied first.
>>>
>>> I was waiting for sign of life on the DTS part, we usually get some ack,
>>> which is good sign we can take the bindings.
>>
>> Such process never happens. DT bindings are the prerequisite here and
>> platform maintainers wait for bindings to be accepted before taking DTS
>> or even sometimes reviewing DTS. Why even bother to review DTS if it
>> follows entirely incorrect binding?
> 
> You are the one requesting DTS with DT bindings for review purpose. You've
> done so regularly this year.

Yes, I asked for DTS for before/while reviewing very questionable
bindings and drivers. Was this reviewed already? Yes, it was. Therefore
after my review, how is this relevant?

Best regards,
Krzysztof