Re: [PATCHv6 07/16] x86/vsyscall: Reorganize the #PF emulation code

[Dave Hansen]

On 6/20/25 16:08, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> But, the resulting code is wonky. It needs to do something more like this:
>>
>> 	if ((error_code & (X86_PF_WRITE | X86_PF_USER)) != X86_PF_USER)
>> 		return false;
>>
>> 	if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR))
>> 		return __emulate_vsyscall(regs, address);
> To do this, LASS needs a proper interlink against NX || SMEP.
> 
> If neither NX nor SMEP are active, the CPU does not report X86_PF_INSTR,
> meaning that fetches are reported as plain reads.
Interesting point.

I think the easiest way to do this is just make a cpuid_deps[] entry for
LASS and NX. If there's a CPU where LASS is available but where NX isn't
available, we have much bigger problems on our hands.