Re: [PATCH v10 07/14] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jun 19 2025 - 06:40:23 EST

Next message: tip-bot2 for Alexey Kardashevskiy: "[tip: x86/sev] x86/sev: Drop unnecessary parameter in snp_issue_guest_request()"
Previous message: Hrushikesh Salunke: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am69-sk: Add idle-states for remaining SERDES instances"
In reply to: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v10 07/14] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe"
Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v10 07/14] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 06:19:28AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> We currently care about x86-64, arm64, ppc 64 and s390. I'm assuming
> they all have a proper 64 bit cmpxchg.

They do. The only 64bit architecture that does not is HPPA IIRC.

Next message: tip-bot2 for Alexey Kardashevskiy: "[tip: x86/sev] x86/sev: Drop unnecessary parameter in snp_issue_guest_request()"
Previous message: Hrushikesh Salunke: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am69-sk: Add idle-states for remaining SERDES instances"
In reply to: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v10 07/14] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe"
Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH v10 07/14] unwind_user/deferred: Make unwind deferral requests NMI-safe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]