Re: [PATCH] mm/rmap: Add NULL checks for rmap_walk_control callbacks

[Dev Jain]

On 19/06/25 1:20 pm, Ye Liu wrote:
> From: Ye Liu <liuye@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add NULL pointer checks for rmap_one callback in rmap_walk operations
> to prevent potential NULL pointer dereferences. Also clean up some
> code by removing redundant comments and caching folio_nr_pages().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Don't really see the point of this patch. The rmap_one call back will
always be there as we need a way to define how to unmap/do the reverse
map walk for one VMA at a time. And the folio_nr_pages() will probably
get cached by the compiler anyways.

>   mm/ksm.c  |  2 +-
>   mm/rmap.c | 14 +++++++-------
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 18b3690bb69a..22ad069d1860 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -3068,7 +3068,7 @@ void rmap_walk_ksm(struct folio *folio, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
>   			if (rwc->invalid_vma && rwc->invalid_vma(vma, rwc->arg))
>   				continue;
>   
> -			if (!rwc->rmap_one(folio, vma, addr, rwc->arg)) {
> +			if (rwc->rmap_one && !rwc->rmap_one(folio, vma, addr, rwc->arg)) {
>   				anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma);
>   				return;
>   			}
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index fb63d9256f09..17d43d104a0d 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1202,8 +1202,7 @@ int mapping_wrprotect_range(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff,
>   	if (!mapping)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	__rmap_walk_file(/* folio = */NULL, mapping, pgoff, nr_pages, &rwc,
> -			 /* locked = */false);
> +	__rmap_walk_file(NULL, mapping, pgoff, nr_pages, &rwc, false);
>   
>   	return state.cleaned;
>   }
> @@ -2806,6 +2805,7 @@ static void rmap_walk_anon(struct folio *folio,
>   	struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
>   	pgoff_t pgoff_start, pgoff_end;
>   	struct anon_vma_chain *avc;
> +	unsigned long nr_pages;
>   
>   	if (locked) {
>   		anon_vma = folio_anon_vma(folio);
> @@ -2817,13 +2817,13 @@ static void rmap_walk_anon(struct folio *folio,
>   	if (!anon_vma)
>   		return;
>   
> +	nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>   	pgoff_start = folio_pgoff(folio);
> -	pgoff_end = pgoff_start + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
> +	pgoff_end = pgoff_start + nr_pages - 1;
>   	anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach(avc, &anon_vma->rb_root,
>   			pgoff_start, pgoff_end) {
>   		struct vm_area_struct *vma = avc->vma;
> -		unsigned long address = vma_address(vma, pgoff_start,
> -				folio_nr_pages(folio));
> +		unsigned long address = vma_address(vma, pgoff_start, nr_pages);
>   
>   		VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address == -EFAULT, vma);
>   		cond_resched();
> @@ -2831,7 +2831,7 @@ static void rmap_walk_anon(struct folio *folio,
>   		if (rwc->invalid_vma && rwc->invalid_vma(vma, rwc->arg))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!rwc->rmap_one(folio, vma, address, rwc->arg))
> +		if (rwc->rmap_one && !rwc->rmap_one(folio, vma, address, rwc->arg))
>   			break;
>   		if (rwc->done && rwc->done(folio))
>   			break;
> @@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ static void __rmap_walk_file(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
>   		if (rwc->invalid_vma && rwc->invalid_vma(vma, rwc->arg))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!rwc->rmap_one(folio, vma, address, rwc->arg))
> +		if (rwc->rmap_one && !rwc->rmap_one(folio, vma, address, rwc->arg))
>   			goto done;
>   		if (rwc->done && rwc->done(folio))
>   			goto done;