Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] rust: time: Rename Delta's methods as_micros_ceil and as_millis

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 17:47:27 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:17 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> There are also methods such as Duration::as_millis(). Yes, those take
>> &self but &self is equivalent to self for Copy types, so there is no
>> difference. And even if we did treat them differently,
>> Duration::as_millis() is actually borrowed->owned as the return type
>> is not a reference, so ...
> 
> In most cases it may not matter, but even if taking either was exactly
> the same, the point of the discussion(s) was what is more idiomatic,
> i.e. how to spell those signatures.
> 
> I understand you are saying that `Duration::as_millis()` is already a
> stable example from the standard library of something that is not
> borrowed -> borrowed, and thus the guidelines should be understood as
> implying it is fine either way. It is still confusing, as shown by
> these repeated discussions, and on the parameter's side of things,
> they still seem to prefer `&self`, including in the equivalent methods
> of this patch.
> 
> Personally, I would use `self`, and clarify the guidelines.

So would the function be defined like this?

fn as_nanos(self) -> i64;

If that's the case, then we've come full circle back to the original
problem; Clippy warns against using as_* names for trait methods that
take self as follows:

warning: methods called `as_*` usually take `self` by reference or `self` by mutable reference
   --> /home/fujita/git/linux-rust/rust/kernel/time/hrtimer.rs:430:17
    |
430 |     fn as_nanos(self) -> i64;
    |                 ^^^^
    |
    = help: consider choosing a less ambiguous name
    = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#wrong_self_convention
    = note: `-W clippy::wrong-self-convention` implied by `-W clippy::all`
    = help: to override `-W clippy::all` add `#[allow(clippy::wrong_self_convention)]`

https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250610132823.3457263-2-fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxx/


HrTimerExpires trait needs as_nanos() method and Instant and Delta
need to implement HrTimerExpires trait.

We need a consistent definition of as_nanos() across the
HrTimerExpires trait, and the Instant and Delta structures.

And it would be better if the definition of as_nanos were consistent
with the other as_* methods.

It looks like the conversion from Delta to i64 doesn’t quite fit any
of the categories in the API guidelines. How should it be defined?