Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] x86/fred: Provide separate IRQ vs. NMI wrappers for entry from KVM

[Xin Li]

On 6/12/2025 2:48 PM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Provide separate wrappers for forwarding IRQs vs NMIs from KVM in
> anticipation of adding support for NMI source reporting, which will add
> an NMI-only parameter, i.e. will further pollute the current API with a
> param that is a hardcoded for one of the two call sites.
>
> Opportunistically tag the non-FRED NMI wrapper __always_inline, as the
> compiler could theoretically generate a function call and trigger and a
                                                                    ^
Nit, looks to me that this is an extra "and".

> (completely benign) "leaving noinstr" warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@xxxxxxxxx>