Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] LKMM generic atomics in Rust

[Alice Ryhl]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:49 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> v5 for LKMM atomics in Rust, you can find the previous versions:
>
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250609224615.27061-1-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250421164221.1121805-1-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20241101060237.1185533-1-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240612223025.1158537-1-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx/
> wip: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240322233838.868874-1-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> The reason of providing our own LKMM atomics is because memory model
> wise Rust native memory model is not guaranteed to work with LKMM and
> having only one memory model throughout the kernel is always better for
> reasoning.
>
> Changes since v4:
>
> * Rename the ordering enum type and corresponding constant in trait All
>   as per feedback from Benno.
>
> * Add more tests for Atomic<{i,u}size> and Atomic<*mut T>.
>
> * Rebase on v6.16-rc2
>
>
> Still please advise how we want to route the patches and for future
> ones:
>
> * Option #1: via tip, I can send a pull request to Ingo at -rc4 or -rc5.
> * Option #2: via rust, I can send a pull request to Miguel at -rc4 or -rc5.
> * Option #3: via my own tree or atomic group in kernel.org, I can send
>              a pull request to Linus at 6.17 merge window.
>
> My default option is #1, but feel free to make any suggestion.
>
> Regards,
> Boqun

Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>