Aw: Re: [net-next v4 2/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index

[Frank Wunderlich]

Hi,

> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2025 um 10:36
> Von: "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: Re: [net-next v4 2/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Use consts instead of fixed integers for accessing IRQ array.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v4:
> > - calculate max from last (rx) irq index and use it for array size too
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>

thanks for review and the RB

i thinking about changing the const names to this:

MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED	=> MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED
MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX		=> MTK_FE_IRQ_TX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX		=> MTK_FE_IRQ_RX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX		=> MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM

because of i currently working on RSS/LRO patches and here MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM is used as name 
with same meaning like my current MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX (where max should be same as RX and NUM
is one more because it is a count).
Current IRQs also target the MTK frame-engine which is different to the PDMA RX engine
used for RSS/LRO later, so MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX and MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX are maybe misleading when RSS/LRO 
support will come in.

can i change the consts like this and keep your RB?

regards Frank