Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Manage lag and run to parity with different slices

[Vincent Guittot]

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 11:22, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Vincent Guittot (3):
> >   sched/fair: Use protect_slice() instead of direct comparison
> >   sched/fair: Limit run to parity to the min slice of enqueued entities
> >   sched/fair: Improve NO_RUN_TO_PARITY
>
> Ah. I wrote these here patches and then totally forgot about them :/.
> They take a different approach.
>
> The approach I took was to move decision to stick with curr after pick,
> instead of before it. That way we can evaluate the tree at the time of
> preemption.

Let me have a look at your patches

>
>