Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Move sophgo,cv1800b-rtc to rtc directory

[Inochi Amaoto]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 08:09:24AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 06:49:38AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 08, 2025 at 05:42:51PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > > The $id path for the sophgo,cv1800b-rtc binding was missing part of the
> > > path 'soc'. However, the correct place for RTC bindings (even if it's
> > > also a "syscon") is the rtc directory, so move the binding there while
> > > fixing the $id value.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 76517429dbfd ("dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: add RTC support for Sophgo CV1800 series")
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/{soc/sophgo => rtc}/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml        | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{soc/sophgo => rtc}/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml (96%)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > > similarity index 96%
> > > rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > > rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > > index 5cf186c396c9..c695d2ff9fcc 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > >  %YAML 1.2
> > >  ---
> > > -$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml#
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml#
> > >  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > >  
> > >  title: Real Time Clock of the Sophgo CV1800 SoC
> > > -- 
> > > 2.47.2
> > > 
> > 
> > As the rtc syscon has a sub function for remoteproc, is it proper to
> > move this binding into rtc subsystem?
> 
> Does that affect the binding (is there more to add)? Looks like an RTC 
> from the binding.
> 

I think at least "resets" property may be added for the this, but I am
not sure whether there will be more.

Regards,
Inochi