Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: use scnprintf() in show functions

[Pranav Tyagi]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 7:50 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 04:33:13PM +0530, Pranav Tyagi wrote:
> > Replace all snprintf() instances with scnprintf(). snprintf() returns
> > the number of bytes that would have been written had there been enough
> > space. For sysfs attributes, snprintf() should not be used for the
> > show() method. Instead use scnprintf() which returns the number of bytes
> > actually written.
>
> No, please use sysfs_emit() if you really want to change this.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> > index 7a5c5ef2db92..f7206e3edea2 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c
> > @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ larp_show(
> >       struct kobject  *kobject,
> >       char            *buf)
> >  {
> > -     return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", xfs_globals.larp);
>
> There is nothing wrong with the original code here, you could use
> sprintf() and it too is ok.  So this type of change is not needed.  But
> again, if you really want to, use sysfs_emit() instead.
>
> Same for all the other show() callback changes you just made.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. I understand the original code is
perfectly fine. All these show callback changes were intended as
cleanups. I'll drop these patches. And will use sysfs_emit() if
I ever have to.

Regards
Pranav Tyagi