Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] vfio/type1: optimize vfio_unpin_pages_remote() for large folio

[David Hildenbrand]

On 17.06.25 11:47, lizhe.67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:43:56 +0200, david@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>   
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > index e952bf8bdfab..d7653f4c10d5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > @@ -801,16 +801,43 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> > >           return pinned;
> > >    }
> > >    
> > > +/* Returned number includes the provided current page. */
> > > +static inline unsigned long folio_remaining_pages(struct folio *folio,
> > > +               struct page *page, unsigned long max_pages)
> > > +{
> > > +       if (!folio_test_large(folio))
> > > +               return 1;
> > > +       return min_t(unsigned long, max_pages,
> > > +                    folio_nr_pages(folio) - folio_page_idx(folio, page));
> > > +}
> >
> > Note that I think that should go somewhere into mm.h, and also get used
> > by GUP. So factoring it out from GUP and then using it here.
>
> I think I need to separate this out into a distinct patch within the
> patchset. Is that correct?

Yes, that's what I would do.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb