[PATCH] [PATCH] docs: bcachefs: fix spelling of 'hierarchy' in idle_work.rst

[Utkarsh Singh]

Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Singh <utkarsh.singh.em@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
index 59a332509dcd..8421b2ab65a2 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ idle" so the system can go to sleep. We don't want to be dribbling out
 background work while the system should be idle.
 
 The complicating factor is that there are a number of background tasks, which
-form a heirarchy (or a digraph, depending on how you divide it up) - one
+form a hierarchy or a digraph, depending on how you divide it up) - one
 background task may generate work for another.
 
-Thus proper idle detection needs to model this heirarchy.
+Thus proper idle detection needs to model this hierarchy.
 
 - Foreground writes
 - Page cache writeback
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ IDLE REGIME
 When the system becomes idle, we should start flushing our pending work
 quicker so the system can go to sleep.
 
-Note that the definition of "idle" depends on where in the heirarchy a task
+Note that the definition of "idle" depends on where in the hierarchy a task
 is - a task should start flushing work more quickly when the task above it has
 stopped generating new work.
 
-- 
2.34.1