Hi Bryan.
On 6/16/25 17:09, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 13/06/2025 10:13, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Per se this concurrent execution shall not lead to the encountered bug,
What does that mean ? Please re-read the commit log, the analysis is all
there.
The concurrent execution does not state a problem, moreover it's a feature
of operating systems.
Sure but this is a _response_ email to you and you know what vfe0_rdi0 is.both an initialization of media entity pads by media_entity_pads_init()
and a registration of a v4l2 devnode inside msm_video_register() are
done under in a proper sequence, aren't they?
No, I clearly haven't explained this clearly enough in the commit log.
vfe0_rdi0 == /dev/video0 is complete. vfe0_rdi1 is not complete there is
no /dev/video1 in user-space.
Please let me ask for a few improvements to the commit message of the next
version of the fix.
Te information like "vfe0_rdi0 == /dev/video0" etc. above vaguely assumes
so much of the context