Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] drm: bridge: add support for Triple 10-BIT

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/06/2025 08:54, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> пн, 16 черв. 2025 р. о 09:50 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
>>
>> On 16/06/2025 08:42, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml       | 1 +
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/simple-bridge.yaml    | 1 +
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/simple-bridge.c                       | 5 +++++
>>>>>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> These patches had no activity/feedback from maintainers for a while,
>>>> so, in case they got lost in the depths of email box, this is a
>>>> friendly reminder that they are still relevant and I would like them
>>>> to move on.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Svyatoslav R.
>>>
>>> These patches had no activity/feedback from maintainers for a while,
>>
>> Really? No activity/feedback?
>>
>> What is this then:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/567addb4-169b-4fd0-aabb-78ceded22702@xxxxxxxxxx/#t
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ptyvn34i377pdu7mqital6v2bqe36oy3yprxb5c3hztni7h52j@6eo64gzxvgg3/
>>
>> You already were sending such pings claiming there is no activity while
>> we provide you the reviews.
>>
>>
> 
> Then why these patches were not picked for more then 2 month if
> everyone acked and reviewed them? I am pinging every month to remind
> that they are still relevant and were not picked!
So acking and reviewing is an activity or not? Because if it is not an
activity, there is no point for me to keep doing it.

It's not a question to me why DRM maintainers do not pick up such
patches, but your message did not question that.

Best regards,
Krzysztof