Re: [patch V2 04/26] timekeeping: Introduce timekeeper ID

[John Stultz]

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 1:33 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As long as there is only a single timekeeper, there is no need to clarify
> which timekeeper is used. But with the upcoming reusage of the timekeeper
> infrastructure for auxiliary clock timekeepers, an ID is required to
> differentiate.
>
> Introduce an enum for timekeeper IDs, introduce a field in struct tk_data
> to store this timekeeper id and add also initialization. The id struct
> field is added at the end of the second cachline, as there is a 4 byte hole
> anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx>

thanks
-john