Re: [PATCH v1] perf stat: Fix uncore aggregation number
From: Chun-Tse Shao
Date: Thu Jun 12 2025 - 18:56:23 EST
Hi Ian, I actually renamed it to `aggr_nr` in v2 patch so it should be
better aligned to json mode, which is using `aggregate-nunber`. But
anyway I think any name other than `cpus` is better.
v2 patch: lore.kernel.org/20250612225324.3315450-1-ctshao@xxxxxxxxxx
Thanks,
CT
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:12 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 8:18 PM Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your test, Ian!
> >
> > I wonder if `nr_pmus` makes sense, since the column would be shared
> > with multiple different pmus. WDYT?
>
> So each PMU in sysfs has a cpumask that specifies which CPUs perf
> should pass to perf_event_open. For example, on a two socket machine
> the cpumask will typically have the first CPU of each socket. If the
> cpumask (or cpus) file isn't present then the cpumask is implicitly
> all online CPUs. Given that the aggregation number is the number of
> CPUs in the cpumask multiplied by the number of PMUs, I think the most
> neutral name is probably "counters" possibly shortened down to "ctrs".
> I suspect others have better suggestions :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > -CT
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:16 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 4:36 PM Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Follow up:
> > > > lore.kernel.org/CAP-5=fVDF4-qYL1Lm7efgiHk7X=_nw_nEFMBZFMcsnOOJgX4Kg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > >
> > > > The patch adds unit aggregation during evsel merge the aggregated uncore
> > > > counters.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on a 2-socket machine with SNC3, uncore_imc_[0-11] and
> > > > cpumask="0,120"
> > > > Before:
> > > > perf stat -e clockticks -I 1000 --per-socket
> > > > # time socket cpus counts unit events
> > > > 1.001085024 S0 1 9615386315 clockticks
> > > > 1.001085024 S1 1 9614287448 clockticks
> > > > perf stat -e clockticks -I 1000 --per-node
> > > > # time node cpus counts unit events
> > > > 1.001029867 N0 1 3205726984 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N1 1 3205444421 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N2 1 3205234018 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N3 1 3205224660 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N4 1 3205207213 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N5 1 3205528246 clockticks
> > > > After:
> > > > perf stat -e clockticks -I 1000 --per-socket
> > > > # time socket cpus counts unit events
> > >
> > > I wonder if there is a better column heading than "cpus" given that
> > > these are imc PMUs.
> > >
> > > > 1.001022937 S0 12 9621463177 clockticks
> > > > 1.001022937 S1 12 9619804949 clockticks
> > > > perf stat -e clockticks -I 1000 --per-node
> > > > # time node cpus counts unit events
> > > > 1.001029867 N0 4 3206782080 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N1 4 3207025354 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N2 4 3207067946 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N3 4 3206871733 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N4 4 3206199005 clockticks
> > > > 1.001029867 N5 4 3205525058 clockticks
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Added Namhyung's ack from the previous email.
> > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/perf/util/stat.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> > > > index 355a7d5c8ab8..52266d773353 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> > > > @@ -527,6 +527,7 @@ static int evsel__merge_aggr_counters(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *alias)
> > > > struct perf_counts_values *aggr_counts_b = &ps_b->aggr[i].counts;
> > > >
> > > > /* NB: don't increase aggr.nr for aliases */
> > > > + ps_a->aggr[i].nr += ps_b->aggr[i].nr;
> > > >
> > > > aggr_counts_a->val += aggr_counts_b->val;
> > > > aggr_counts_a->ena += aggr_counts_b->ena;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.50.0.rc1.591.g9c95f17f64-goog
> > > >