Re: [PATCH RFC v4 1/2] leds: leds-lp50xx: Handle reg to get correct multi_index
From: Lee Jones
Date: Thu Jun 12 2025 - 06:55:52 EST
On Mon, 26 May 2025, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On 5/26/25 16:54, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> > mc_subled used for multi_index needs well defined array indexes,
> > to guarantee the desired result, optionally use reg for that.
> >
> > If devicetree child nodes is processed in random or reverse order
> > you may end up with multi_index "blue green red" instead of the expected
> > "red green blue".
> > If user space apps uses multi_index to deduce how to control the leds
> > they would most likely be broken without this patch if devicetree
> > processing is reversed (which it appears to be).
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji.dts has reg set
> > but I don't see how it can have worked without this change.
> >
> > If reg is not set, the previous behavior is kept, index will be in
> > the order nodes are processed.
>
> This is a bug and I don't see any value in keeping buggy code.
> Just expect reg to be present and make sure that all in-tree
> dts files using these bindings use them in a proper way.
>
> To not break existing users of stable releases, if any of them
> implement DT subnodes without 'reg' property, we can just not mark this
> commit with "Fixed" tag, so that it wasn't applied to stable releases.
> Although I am not sure if we should not fix it there as well.
> I'm leaving it to Lee.
We cannot assume that a patch won't end up in LTS just by omitting the
Fixes: tag. Sasha's AUTOSEL tooling it still likely to pick it up if we
describe the commit as a fix, which we do and is correct.
I see no reason not to apply it. If users are relying on broken
semantics, then those should be fixed also.
Is everyone happy with this patch as-is?
> > If reg is out of range, an error is returned.
> > reg within led child nodes starts with 0, to map to the iout in each bank.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Adolfsson <johan.adolfsson@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > index 02cb1565a9fb..8067aaa916bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static int lp50xx_probe_dt(struct lp50xx *priv)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > fwnode_for_each_child_node(child, led_node) {
> > + int multi_index = num_colors;
> > ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(led_node, "color",
> > &color_id);
> > if (ret) {
> > @@ -483,8 +484,13 @@ static int lp50xx_probe_dt(struct lp50xx *priv)
> > dev_err(priv->dev, "Cannot read color\n");
> > return ret;
> > }
> > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(led_node, "reg", &multi_index);
> > + if (ret == 0 && multi_index >= LP50XX_LEDS_PER_MODULE) {
> > + dev_err(priv->dev, "reg %i out of range\n", multi_index);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > - mc_led_info[num_colors].color_index = color_id;
> > + mc_led_info[multi_index].color_index = color_id;
> > num_colors++;
> > }
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]