Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7949: use spi_is_bpw_supported()

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:21:56 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 6/11/25 10:15 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:04:58AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:  
> >> Use spi_is_bpw_supported() instead of directly accessing spi->controller  
> >> ->bits_per_word_mask. bits_per_word_mask may be 0, which implies that  
> >> 8-bits-per-word is supported. spi_is_bpw_supported() takes this into
> >> account while spi_ctrl_mask == SPI_BPW_MASK(8) does not.  
> >   
> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/c8b8a963-6cef-4c9b-bfef-dab2b7bd0b0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/  
> > 
> > Reported-by yourself. I'm wondering if the Closes adds a value in this case.
> > Otherwise I can do the same to maybe 10% of my patches, for instance. But
> > I don't think I put Closes tag on whatever improvement potential bug fix
> > I do report (read: notice) myself.  
> 
> I included it so that Da Xue will know that this has been resolved and
> doesn't need to do anything more. Normally I would have not included
> it though.

If I followed the discussion correctly does this need a fixes tag?

> 
> >   
> >> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > 
> > Code wise LGTM,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >   
>