Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7949: use spi_is_bpw_supported()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:04:58AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Use spi_is_bpw_supported() instead of directly accessing spi->controller
> ->bits_per_word_mask. bits_per_word_mask may be 0, which implies that
> 8-bits-per-word is supported. spi_is_bpw_supported() takes this into
> account while spi_ctrl_mask == SPI_BPW_MASK(8) does not.

> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/c8b8a963-6cef-4c9b-bfef-dab2b7bd0b0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Reported-by yourself. I'm wondering if the Closes adds a value in this case.
Otherwise I can do the same to maybe 10% of my patches, for instance. But
I don't think I put Closes tag on whatever improvement potential bug fix
I do report (read: notice) myself.

> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Code wise LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko