Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add ordering annotation types

From: Boqun Feng
Date: Tue Jun 10 2025 - 13:59:37 EST


On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 10:30:55AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
[...]
> > > +/// Describes the exact memory ordering of an `impl` [`All`].
> > > +pub enum OrderingDesc {
> >
> > Why not name this `Ordering`?
> >
>
> I was trying to avoid having an `Ordering` enum in a `ordering` mod.
> Also I want to save the name "Ordering" for the generic type parameter
> of an atomic operation, e.g.
>
> pub fn xchg<Ordering: ALL>(..)
>
> this enum is more of an internal implementation detail, and users should
> not use this enum directly, so I would like to avoid potential
> confusion.
>
> I have played a few sealed trait tricks on my end, but seems I cannot
> achieve:
>
> 1) `OrderingDesc` is only accessible in the atomic mod.
> 2) `All` is only impl-able in the atomic mod, while it can be used as a
> trait bound outside kernel crate.
>
> Maybe there is a trick I'm missing?
>

Something like this seems to work:

pub(super) mod private {
/// Describes the exact memory ordering of an `impl` [`All`].
pub enum Ordering {
/// Relaxed ordering.
Relaxed,
/// Acquire ordering.
Acquire,
/// Release ordering.
Release,
/// Fully-ordered.
Full,
}

pub trait HasOrderingDesc {
/// Describes the exact memory ordering.
const ORDERING: Ordering;
}
}

/// The trait bound for annotating operations that should support all orderings.
pub trait All: private::HasOrderingDesc { }

impl private::HasOrderingDesc for Relaxed {
const ORDERING: private::Ordering = private::Ordering::Relaxed;
}

the trick is to seal the enum and the trait together.

Regards,
Boqun

> > > + /// Relaxed ordering.
> > > + Relaxed,
> > > + /// Acquire ordering.
> > > + Acquire,
> > > + /// Release ordering.
> > > + Release,
> > > + /// Fully-ordered.
> > > + Full,
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/// The trait bound for annotating operations that should support all orderings.
> > > +pub trait All {
> > > + /// Describes the exact memory ordering.
> > > + const ORDER: OrderingDesc;
> >
> > And then here: `ORDERING`.
>
[..]