Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] kselftest/arm64/mte: refactor check_mmap_option test

From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Jun 10 2025 - 11:45:08 EST


On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:

> Before add mtefar testcase on check_mmap_option.c,
> refactor check_mmap_option.

Please describe the intended refactoring here.

> +#define CHECK_ANON_MEM 0
> +#define CHECK_FILE_MEM 1
> +#define CHECK_CLEAR_PROT_MTE 2
> +

Perhaps use enums for this sort of thing?

> +{
> + static char test_name[TEST_NAME_MAX];
> + const char* check_type_str;

Coding style would usually be

const char *check_type_str;

> + snprintf(test_name, TEST_NAME_MAX,
> + "Check %s with %s mapping, %s mode, %s memory and %s\n",
> + check_type_str, mapping_str, sync_str, mem_type_str, tag_check_str);

sizeof(test_name).

> evaluate_test(check_anonymous_memory_mapping(USE_MMAP, MTE_SYNC_ERR, MAP_PRIVATE, TAG_CHECK_OFF),
> - "Check anonymous memory with private mapping, sync error mode, mmap memory and tag check off\n");
> + format_test_name(CHECK_ANON_MEM, USE_MMAP, MTE_SYNC_ERR, MAP_PRIVATE, TAG_CHECK_OFF));

Looking at this I can't help but think that the more common pattern for
test programs where we have an array of test parameters that we loop
through might make sense:

for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases); i++) {
format_test_name(test_cases[i]);

switch (test_cases[i].test_type) {
case CHECK_ANON_MEM:
check_anonymous_memory_mapping(USE_MMAP, ...);

That seems a bit more legible and maintainable.

> mte_disable_pstate_tco();

The management of this could be added as a parameter in the test struct.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature