On 10/06/2025 10:48, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hello Wenmeng.
On 5/16/25 10:27, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
Add support for the camera subsystem on the SM8550 Qualcomm SoC. This
includes bringing up the CSIPHY, CSID, VFE/RDI interfaces.
SM8550 provides
- 3 x VFE, 3 RDI per VFE
- 2 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE
- 3 x CSID
- 2 x CSID Lite
- 8 x CSI PHY
Co-developed-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 210 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/
dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
index e9bb077aa9f0..722521496a2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
@@ -3326,6 +3326,216 @@ cci2_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 {
};
};
+ isp: isp@acb7000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sm8550-camss";
+
This is the first time, when 'isp' label is used instead of 'camss', it
might
be I missed the context, is there any particular reason to do such a
change?
If the label name is changed to the regular 'camss', then
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.