Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

From: Vladimir Zapolskiy
Date: Tue Jun 10 2025 - 08:58:48 EST


On 6/10/25 12:50, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 10/06/2025 10:48, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hello Wenmeng.

On 5/16/25 10:27, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
Add support for the camera subsystem on the SM8550 Qualcomm SoC. This
includes bringing up the CSIPHY, CSID, VFE/RDI interfaces.

SM8550 provides
- 3 x VFE, 3 RDI per VFE
- 2 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE
- 3 x CSID
- 2 x CSID Lite
- 8 x CSI PHY

Co-developed-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 210 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/
dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
index e9bb077aa9f0..722521496a2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
@@ -3326,6 +3326,216 @@ cci2_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 {
              };
          };
+        isp: isp@acb7000 {
+            compatible = "qcom,sm8550-camss";
+

This is the first time, when 'isp' label is used instead of 'camss', it
might
be I missed the context, is there any particular reason to do such a
change?

If the label name is changed to the regular 'camss', then

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.


My bad, but I don't understand this comment, it seems irrelevant...

The expressed concern is about the novel label name.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir