[PATCH 2/4] docs: netlink: netlink-raw.rst: use :ref: instead of :doc:

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Having :doc: references with relative paths doesn't always work,
as it may have troubles when O= is used. So, replace them by
Sphinx cross-reference tag that are now created by ynl_gen_rst.py.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/netlink-raw.rst | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/netlink-raw.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/netlink-raw.rst
index 31fc91020eb3..aae296c170c5 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/netlink-raw.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/netlink-raw.rst
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ Sub-messages
 ------------
 
 Several raw netlink families such as
-:doc:`rt-link<../../networking/netlink_spec/rt-link>` and
-:doc:`tc<../../networking/netlink_spec/tc>` use attribute nesting as an
+:ref:`rt-link<netlink-rt-link>` and
+:ref:`tc<netlink-tc>` use attribute nesting as an
 abstraction to carry module specific information.
 
 Conceptually it looks as follows::
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ then this is an error.
 Nested struct definitions
 -------------------------
 
-Many raw netlink families such as :doc:`tc<../../networking/netlink_spec/tc>`
+Many raw netlink families such as :ref:`tc<netlink-tc>`
 make use of nested struct definitions. The ``netlink-raw`` schema makes it
 possible to embed a struct within a struct definition using the ``struct``
 property. For example, the following struct definition embeds the
-- 
2.49.0