Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use non-coherent memory for DMA

[James Clark]

On 10/06/2025 9:26 am, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, at 17:32, James Clark wrote:
> > Using coherent memory here isn't functionally necessary. Because the
> > change to use non-coherent memory isn't overly complex and only a few
> > synchronization points are required, we might as well do it while fixing
> > up some other DMA issues.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This version looks good to me,
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> I had reviewed an internal version originally and had some comment
> on that, all of which are addressed now. You did not Cc me on the
> other patches, so I looked them up in the archive, Patch 3 also

Yes sorry about that. I've just started using "b4 send" and I was under 
the impression that it would automatically CC all patches the same way, 
but apparently not. Maybe I'm holding it wrong.

> looks good to me and complements this one (i.e. you really want
> the combination). I did not understand the logic in patch 4,
> and it would be good if someone else can take a closer look
> at that in order to Ack that.
>
>        Arnd