Re: [PATCH 1/4] media: i2c: vd55g1: Fix RATE macros not being expressed in bps

From: Sakari Ailus
Date: Tue Jun 10 2025 - 05:02:09 EST


On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 03:46:21PM +0200, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c b/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c
> index 25e2fc88a0367bf6a28bb22d209323ace99299f2..78dd22d9cab03edf4ff3e5a301f8d045e930c997 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c
> @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@
> #define VD55G1_FWPATCH_REVISION_MINOR 9
> #define VD55G1_XCLK_FREQ_MIN (6 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
> #define VD55G1_XCLK_FREQ_MAX (27 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
> -#define VD55G1_MIPI_RATE_MIN (250 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
> -#define VD55G1_MIPI_RATE_MAX (1200 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
> +#define VD55G1_MIPI_RATE_MIN (250 * MEGA)
> +#define VD55G1_MIPI_RATE_MAX (1200 * MEGA)

As the meaning of Hz is just /s, I don't think the use of HZ_PER_MHZ was
wrong in any way above.

--
Sakari Ailus