Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] udp_tunnel: remove rtnl_lock dependency

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Mon Jun 09 2025 - 18:38:34 EST

Next message: Reinette Chatre: "Re: [PATCH v5 27/29] fs/resctrl: Add file system mechanism for architecture info file"
Previous message: Doug Anderson: "Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fix REFCLK setting"
In reply to: Stanislav Fomichev: "[PATCH net-next v2 4/4] Revert "bnxt_en: bring back rtnl_lock() in the bnxt_open() path""
Next in thread: Stanislav Fomichev: "Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] udp_tunnel: remove rtnl_lock dependency"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:25:37 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Recently bnxt had to grow back a bunch of rtnl dependencies because
> of udp_tunnel's infra. Add separate (global) mutext to protect
> udp_tunnel state.

Appears to break the selftest, unfortunately:
https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?test=udp-tunnel-nic-sh&branch=net-next-2025-06-09--21-00
--
pw-bot: cr

Next message: Reinette Chatre: "Re: [PATCH v5 27/29] fs/resctrl: Add file system mechanism for architecture info file"
Previous message: Doug Anderson: "Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: fix REFCLK setting"
In reply to: Stanislav Fomichev: "[PATCH net-next v2 4/4] Revert "bnxt_en: bring back rtnl_lock() in the bnxt_open() path""
Next in thread: Stanislav Fomichev: "Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] udp_tunnel: remove rtnl_lock dependency"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]