Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add Voyager board support
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Mon Jun 09 2025 - 12:18:22 EST
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 08:06:07PM +0800, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 05:00:06PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > [EXTERNAL MAIL]
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 17:00:06 +0100
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: Ben Zong-You Xie <ben717@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx, palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx, aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > > alex@xxxxxxxx, robh@xxxxxxxxxx, krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx,
> > > tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx,
> > > prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > > tim609@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add Voyager board support
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:07:39PM +0800, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote:
> > > > The Voyager is a 9.6” x 9.6” Micro ATX form factor development board
> > > > including Andes QiLai SoC. This patch series adds minimal device tree
> > > > files for the QiLai SoC and the Voyager board [1].
> > > >
> > > > Now only support basic uart drivers to boot up into a basic console. Other
> > > > features will be added later.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://www.andestech.com/en/products-solutions/andeshape-platforms/qilai-chip/
> > >
> > > Ball is in your court now, after rc1 make a tree and get it in
> > > linux-next, and then send a pr to soc@xxxxxxxxxx with this new content.
> > > Perhaps the defconfig should go separately, I can take that one if you
> > > want.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Conor.
> >
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > Thanks for your guidance on these patches. I will send a PR to
> > soc@xxxxxxxxxx as you suggested.
> >
> > For the defconfig patch, I'm happy for you to handle it. Just let me
> > know if there's anything specific you'd like me to include.
>
> Okay, I picked it up on the basis that you'll send this all to Arnd for
> 6.17
Sorry, I think that was really poorly worded. I picked it up on the
basis that you're going to send the other patches in the series to Arnd
for 6.17.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature