Re: [PATCH v2] mm: madvise: use walk_page_range_vma() instead of walk_page_range()

From: Lorenzo Stoakes
Date: Mon Jun 09 2025 - 06:23:19 EST


Andrew - could you drop this patch until this is fixed? Whoops!

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:52:47AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 05/06/2025 09:31, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > We've already found the VMA within madvise_walk_vmas() before calling
> > specific madvise behavior functions like madvise_free_single_vma().
> > So calling walk_page_range() and doing find_vma() again seems
> > unnecessary. It also prevents potential optimizations in those madvise
> > callbacks, particularly the use of dedicated per-VMA locking.
>
> FYI it looks like this patch breaks all the guard-region mm selftests with:
>
> # guard-regions.c:719:split_merge:Expected madvise(ptr, 10 * page_size,
> MADV_GUARD_INSTALL) (-1) == 0 (0)
>
> Am I the only one that runs these things? :)

I normally do :) the one time I don't... :P

>
> [...]
>
> > mm/madvise.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static long madvise_guard_install(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long nr_pages = 0;
> >
> > /* Returns < 0 on error, == 0 if success, > 0 if zap needed. */
> > - err = walk_page_range_mm(vma->vm_mm, start, end,
> > + err = walk_page_range_vma(vma, start, end,
> > &guard_install_walk_ops, &nr_pages);
>
> IIRC walk_page_range_mm() is an internal API that allows the install_pte()
> callback, and the other (public) APIs explicitly disallow it, so presumably
> walk_page_range_vma() is now returning an error due to install_pte != NULL?
>

Yeah dear god I missed this oops!

Yeah Barry - could you revert this change for the guard region bits please? So
this is intentional as we do not want anything non-mm to have access to
install_pte.

I'll maybe have a think about this in terms of whether we want to do this a
different way but for now this will fix the issue and get the patch in.

Otherwise patch is ok AFAICT...

With that fixed feel free to propagate tag to a v2.

> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> > @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static long madvise_guard_remove(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > if (!is_valid_guard_vma(vma, /* allow_locked = */true))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - return walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end,
> > + return walk_page_range_vma(vma, start, end,
> > &guard_remove_walk_ops, NULL);
> > }
> >
>