Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix issues with ARM Processor CPER records
From: Daniel Ferguson
Date: Fri Jun 06 2025 - 14:30:53 EST
On 10/14/2024 3:00 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 13:57, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:07:13AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Jason Tian (1):
>>> RAS: Report all ARM processor CPER information to userspace
>>>
>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (4):
>>> efi/cper: Adjust infopfx size to accept an extra space
>>> efi/cper: Add a new helper function to print bitmasks
>>> efi/cper: align ARM CPER type with UEFI 2.9A/2.10 specs
>>> docs: efi: add CPER functions to driver-api
>>>
>>> .../driver-api/firmware/efi/index.rst | 11 +++-
>>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 27 ++++----
>>> drivers/firmware/efi/cper-arm.c | 52 ++++++++--------
>>> drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>> drivers/ras/ras.c | 41 +++++++++++-
>>> include/linux/cper.h | 12 ++--
>>> include/linux/ras.h | 16 ++++-
>>> include/ras/ras_event.h | 48 ++++++++++++--
>>> 8 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>
>> With the issues to patch 1 fixed:
>>
>> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I'm presuming this'll go through Ard's tree. Alternatively, I can pick it up
>> too with Ard's ack.
>>
>
> Either works for me.
>
> Mauro: please put all maintainers on cc of the code you are touching - thanks.
What can I do to help this patch move forward?
I noticed it needs to be rebased as of kernel v6.15.
Would it be helpful if I were to rebase, add all the maintainers to the cc, and
resubmit ?
I did rebase to v6.15 and tested. Everything still seems good to go.