Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] kdump: wait for DMA to finish when using CMA

[David Hildenbrand]

On 30.05.25 22:29, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> When re-using the CMA area for kdump there is a risk of pending DMA into
> pinned user pages in the CMA area.
>
> Pages that are pinned long-term are migrated away from CMA, so these are
> not a concern. Pages pinned without FOLL_LONGTERM remain in the CMA and may
> possibly be the source or destination of a pending DMA transfer.

I'll note that we right now do have an upstream BUG where that is 
sometimes not the case. I mentioned it previously that such bugs will be 
a problem :(

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250523023709epcms1p236d4f55b79adb9366ec1cf6d5792b06b@epcms1p2

> Although there is no clear specification how long a page may be pinned
> without FOLL_LONGTERM, pinning without the flag shows an intent of the
> caller to only use the memory for short-lived DMA transfers, not a transfer
> initiated by a device asynchronously at a random time in the future.
>
> Add a delay of CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_SEC seconds before starting the kdump
> kernel, giving such short-lived DMA transfers time to finish before the CMA
> memory is re-used by the kdump kernel.
>
> Set CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_SEC to 10 seconds - chosen arbitrarily as both
> a huge margin for a DMA transfer, yet not increasing the kdump time
> too significantly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - renamed CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_SEC to CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_MSEC, change delay to 10 seconds
> - introduce a cma_dma_timeout_sec initialized to CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_SEC
>    to make the timeout trivially tunable if needed in the future
>
> ---
>   include/linux/crash_core.h |  3 +++
>   kernel/crash_core.c        | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/crash_core.h b/include/linux/crash_core.h
> index 44305336314e..805a07042c96 100644
> --- a/include/linux/crash_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/crash_core.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ static inline unsigned int crash_get_elfcorehdr_size(void) { return 0; }
>   /* Alignment required for elf header segment */
>   #define ELF_CORE_HEADER_ALIGN   4096
>   
> +/* Default value for cma_dma_timeout_sec */
> +#define CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_SEC 10
> +
>   extern int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
>   				   unsigned long long mstart,
>   				   unsigned long long mend);
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 335b8425dd4b..a255c9e2ef29 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>   #include <linux/reboot.h>
>   #include <linux/btf.h>
>   #include <linux/objtool.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/page.h>
>   #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -33,6 +34,11 @@
>   /* Per cpu memory for storing cpu states in case of system crash. */
>   note_buf_t __percpu *crash_notes;
>   
> +/* time to wait for possible DMA to finish before starting the kdump kernel
> + * when a CMA reservation is used
> + */
> +unsigned int cma_dma_timeout_sec = CMA_DMA_TIMEOUT_SEC;
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
>   
>   int kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo(struct kimage *image)
> @@ -97,6 +103,17 @@ int kexec_crash_loaded(void)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kexec_crash_loaded);
>   
> +static void crash_cma_clear_pending_dma(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int s = cma_dma_timeout_sec;
> +
> +	if (!crashk_cma_cnt)
> +		return;
> +
> +	while (s--)
> +		mdelay(1000);

Any reason we cannot do it in a single mdelay() invocation?

mdelay() already is a loop around udelay on larger values IIUC.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb