Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in gup_longterm

[David Hildenbrand]

On 27.05.25 18:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> The kselftest framework uses the string logged when a test result is
> reported as the unique identifier for a test, using it to track test
> results between runs. The gup_longterm test fails to follow this
> pattern, it runs a single test function repeatedly with various
> parameters but each result report is a string logging an error message
> which is fixed between runs.
>
> Since the code already logs each test uniquely before it starts refactor
> to also print this to a buffer, then use that name as the test result.
> This isn't especially pretty but is relatively straightforward and is a
> great help to tooling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c
> index e60e62809186..f84ea97c2543 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c
> @@ -93,33 +93,48 @@ static void do_test(int fd, size_t size, enum test_type type, bool shared)
>   	__fsword_t fs_type = get_fs_type(fd);
>   	bool should_work;
>   	char *mem;
> +	int result = KSFT_PASS;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	if (fd < 0) {
> +		result = KSFT_FAIL;
> +		goto report;
> +	}

Not a fan of that, especially as it suddenly converts 
ksft_test_result_skip() -- e.g., on the memfd path -- to KSFT_FAIL.

Can we just do the log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL/KSFT_SKIP) in the caller?


--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb