RE: [PATCH v1] net/ncsi: fix buffer overflow in getting version id
From: Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn
Date: Mon May 26 2025 - 22:24:13 EST
Hi Paul,
Thank for your reply and suggestions.
Since the net-next is closed now: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/net-next.html
I will submit new patch(new mail thread) while it re-open.
BTW, seems the re-open day is wrong: "Closed until April 7th", may I know which day will it open? Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2025 4:15 AM
> To: Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn <Jerry_C_Chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: patrick@xxxxxxxxx; Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/ncsi: fix buffer overflow in getting version id
>
> [External Sender]
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:32:26AM +0000, Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn
> wrote:
> > Sorry for late replay, it takes some effort to change company policy of the
> proprietary.
>
> I can imagine! However it's not necessary to send patches from corporate
> e-mail address via the corporate mail server, you can just send from your own
> personal account with the appropriate From:
> specification to attribute it to your corporate address[0].
>
> > For the questions:
>
> Please consider just using standard inline method of replying in the future,
> letting your MUA quote the original message for context properly.
>
> > 1. What upstream tree did you intend it for and why?
> > - Linux mainline
> > We are developing openBMC with kernel-6.6.
> > For submitting patch to kernel-6.6 stable tree, it should exist in mainline
> first.
> > Reference:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openbmc/linux/commits/d
> >
> ev-6.6/__;!!ObgLwW8oGsQ!lfBTzKPEhZloN2Uwc85U1tsMWw41Yq8dTkG9oxjckT
> okV1
> > 1cR1AQaKFRrIwg9G02e1CpUC_SUX9aFCoEREqXU-Q$
>
> Indeed, and the process of submitting to mainline implies that for each
> subsystem there's a tree which subsystem maintainer(s) use for the integration
> and which is later offered as a the pull request for the upcoming version,
> usually it's called {subsystem}-next (also such trees get tested together being
> merged into linux-next regularly). I guess in this case you should make sure
> your patch applies to net-next (and makes sense there). Neither the current
> submission[1] nor the previous one[2] were applicable (see
> "netdev/tree_selection success Guessing tree name failed - patch did not
> apply" and indeed I tried to "git am" it manually to what was "net-next" back
> then and it failed.
>
> > 2. Have you seen such cards in the wild? It wouldn't harm mentioning
> > specific examples in the commit message to probably help people
> > searching for problems specific to them later. You can also consider
> > adding Fixes: and Cc: stable tags if this bugfix solves a real issue
> > and should be backported to stable kernels.
> > - This NIC is developed by META terminus team and the problematic string
> is:
> > The channel Version Str : 24.12.08-000 I will update it to commit
> > message later.
>
> I see, thank you. Sigh, this 12 characters limit doesn't seem to make much
> sense, too restrictive to fit a useful part of "git describe --tags" even, but it is
> what it is...
>
> [0]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/
> submitting-patches.html*from-line__;Iw!!ObgLwW8oGsQ!lfBTzKPEhZloN2Uwc8
> 5U1tsMWw41Yq8dTkG9oxjckTokV11cR1AQaKFRrIwg9G02e1CpUC_SUX9aFCoE
> FjZPgHI$
> [1]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/p
> atch/20250515083448.3511588-1-Jerry_C_Chen@xxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ObgLwW8
> oGsQ!lfBTzKPEhZloN2Uwc85U1tsMWw41Yq8dTkG9oxjckTokV11cR1AQaKFRrIw
> g9G02e1CpUC_SUX9aFCoEd6rkbGA$
> [2]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/p
> atch/20250227055044.3878374-1-Jerry_C_Chen@xxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ObgLwW8
> oGsQ!lfBTzKPEhZloN2Uwc85U1tsMWw41Yq8dTkG9oxjckTokV11cR1AQaKFRrIw
> g9G02e1CpUC_SUX9aFCoEVccOzuI$