Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/khugepaged: clean up refcount check using folio_expected_ref_count()

[David Hildenbrand]

On 23.05.25 11:14, Shivank Garg wrote:
> Use folio_expected_ref_count() instead of open-coded logic in
> is_refcount_suitable(). This avoids code duplication and improves
> clarity.
>
> Drop is_refcount_suitable() as it is no longer needed.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@xxxxxxx>
> ---

Likely we should revert the patches, so we can have the fix in first.

So in this patch here, we would only convert the remaining 2 instances.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb