Re: [PATCH] Documentation/devicetree: Fixing a typo in usuage-model.rst

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Mon May 19 2025 - 12:38:13 EST


On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 04:40:20PM +0200, Sukrut Heroorkar wrote:
> Fixes a minor spelling issue by correcting "busses" to the correct plural form "buses".

I think those are maybe valid us-english spellings of the word, and your
subject has a typo.

>
> Signed-off-by: Sukurt Heroorkar <hsukrut3@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst
> index 0717426856b2..6f9a2c0a380a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ links from one node to another outside of the natural tree structure.
>
> Conceptually, a common set of usage conventions, called 'bindings',
> is defined for how data should appear in the tree to describe typical
> -hardware characteristics including data busses, interrupt lines, GPIO
> +hardware characteristics including data buses, interrupt lines, GPIO
> connections, and peripheral devices.
>
> As much as possible, hardware is described using existing bindings to
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ names are simply text strings, it is easy to extend existing bindings
> or create new ones by defining new nodes and properties. Be wary,
> however, of creating a new binding without first doing some homework
> about what already exists. There are currently two different,
> -incompatible, bindings for i2c busses that came about because the new
> +incompatible, bindings for i2c buses that came about because the new
> binding was created without first investigating how i2c devices were
> already being enumerated in existing systems.
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature