RE: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()

From: Justin Lai
Date: Mon May 19 2025 - 08:18:19 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 2:34 PM
> To: kuba@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; horms@xxxxxxxxxx; Ping-Ke Shih
> <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Justin Lai
> <justinlai0215@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()
>
> Use min() instead of min_t() to avoid the possibility of casting to the
> wrong type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - Remove the Fixes tag.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> index 6251548d50ff..8c902eaeb5ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> @@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_time_mitigation(u32 time_us)
> u8 msb, time_count, time_unit;
> u16 int_miti;
>
> - time_us = min_t(int, time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
> + time_us = min(time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
>
> msb = fls(time_us);
> if (msb >= RTASE_MITI_COUNT_BIT_NUM) {
> @@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_packet_num_mitigation(u16
> pkt_num)
> u8 msb, pkt_num_count, pkt_num_unit;
> u16 int_miti;
>
> - pkt_num = min_t(int, pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
> + pkt_num = min(pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
>
> if (pkt_num > 60) {
> pkt_num_unit = RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM_IDX;
> --
> 2.34.1

Hi reviewers,

I apologize for the interruption, I would like to ask why this patch is
rejected on patchwork.

Justin