Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module

[Viresh Kumar]

On 15-05-25, 07:41, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Yes and that is understood. I see a few drivers calling ...
> 
>  platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", -1, NULL, 0);
> 
> One option, and I don't know if this would be acceptable, would be to add a
> new wrapper function in the cpufreq-dt driver for the above that other
> drivers could call and that would create the dependency you need.

Doing that won't be a problem, but I doubt if that is a better than
adding a soft dependency here. I personally felt that the soft
dependency may be the right way here. The cpufreq-dt file presents a
driver, a device can be added from any file and that doesn't require
the driver file to be inserted first. If the platform wants to
simplify and create a dependency, a soft dependency looks okay.

-- 
viresh